Intake questionnaire by QR or email
Your front desk emails it or shows a QR code to scan in the waiting room. The patient answers from their phone, with autosave, and every specialty asks its own questions.
416 ms in May, 514 in July. They are two numbers in two folders until someone puts them on the same line. Whether you work on paper today or in the software you already run, the interval that stretched, the result that came back, and your anticoagulated patient’s time in range do not announce themselves.
One patient’s QTc, on a single line
Five electrocardiograms from the same patient, one after another. The jump from May to July is the visit.
| Date | Value |
|---|---|
| Aug 25 | 424 ms |
| Nov 25 | 431 ms |
| Feb 26 | 428 ms |
| May 26 | 416 ms |
| Jul 26 | 514 ms |
Each study keeps its own date, its correction formula, and your interpretation. May’s 416 ms and July’s 514 land on the same line, without you going to look for them.
CV risk, already computed when you open the chart
Blood pressure, heart rate, LDL, 10-year risk, and the latest QTc, each against its own reference. Without asking for it or running a report.
Blood pressure
Reference: ACC/AHA bands: normal <120, stage 1 ≥130, stage 2 ≥140
Value: 138/86 mmHg
What the system reads: Stage 1 hypertension
Heart rate
Reference: From the same July 29 check as the pressure and the LDL
Value: 74 bpm
What the system reads: At target
LDL
Reference: Moderate-risk goal: under 100 mg/dL (ESC/EAS 2019)
Value: 130 mg/dL
What the system reads: Off target
10-year CV risk
Reference: Framingham recalibrated, with its provenance and bias card
Value: 14.7 %
What the system reads: Intermediate risk
QTc · Bazett (machine)
Reference: Acting threshold: QTc ≥500 ms
Value: 514 ms
What the system reads: Off target
QTc · Fridericia
Reference: Study predates this version: the value is not invented
Value: —
What the system reads: No data
Every figure arrives with its arrow against the previous reading and with the goal its risk stratum calls for. Goals and thresholds are configured for your country and your judgment.
On the left, what happens in your practice today. On the right, what the system does about it.
What hurts
An abnormal echocardiogram sat in an inbox and nobody ever got around to opening it
What Medi Control Pro does
Everything you order lands in one queue with three tabs — results that arrived, still waiting, overdue — with the days each one has been sitting there and a filter for yours or the whole practice. “Acknowledge” records that you are the one who saw it.
What hurts
Everyone measures QTc with whichever formula they remember, and the machine with its own
What Medi Control Pro does
Bazett, Fridericia, Framingham (Sagie), and Hodges, all four on the same card, with the machine’s own flagged as such. Below them, the threshold you act on — QTc ≥500 ms — with its citation, and the 450 ms mark declared as advisory because the societies disagree.
What hurts
Imported risk scores overestimate in your patients and push you to overtreat
What Medi Control Pro does
10-year risk is computed with the model and the recalibration your country goes by, and it arrives with its card open: model, derivation cohort, validated age range, source, and known bias. You know where the number came from before you decide with it.
What hurts
A system “suggests” the next warfarin dose and leaves you holding the judgment and the liability
What Medi Control Pro does
Above the table of INR draws, with its weekly regimen and its phase, the product writes: “Historical record. The system never proposes the next dose.” It calculates, sorts, and remembers; deciding is still yours.
«They are not recalculated: rewriting the QTc of an already recorded study would alter an attested clinical value.»
A recorded study stays put. If a correction was not computed on the day of that ECG, the system leaves the cell blank rather than filling it in today with a number you never saw: what you signed still says what it said.
The “Pending studies” queue
What was ordered and what has come back, in one queue. Filtered to yours or to the whole practice.
9 days an abnormal echocardiogram, with its file already attached, can sit waiting for someone to open it. In your practice, how many are sitting there right now?
| Patient | Days waiting | Study | What the result says |
|---|---|---|---|
| Roberto C. | 9 | Transthoracic echocardiogram | Abnormal · file attached |
The result that came back does not get lost between the inbox and the folder: it enters a queue with the days it has been waiting, and “Acknowledge” writes down who saw it and when.
It does not ask you to change how you practice. It steps only into the moments where you lose time, or lose a number.
The appointment already confirmed fires its own reminder by email, and the one still up in the air asks for confirmation, with nobody going through the schedule. Those who booked and never confirmed stay on a list ordered by how soon the slot is, with their phone number at hand and a counter of how many are still waiting and how many bookings expired. That is the appointment you lose today with nobody telling you.
From home they report chest pain or tightness, how much exertion it takes to get short of breath, palpitations, fainting, leg swelling, and smoking. What they answer lands in a queue with an administrative and a clinical review, where you confirm field by field what goes into the chart.
Blood pressure and heart rate already classified, each with its arrow against the previous reading; LDL against the goal their risk stratum calls for; and the latest ECG with its corrections and your interpretation. If they are anticoagulated, the chip says so on every tab anyone opens.
The risk preview moves with you: change the factors and watch the number change, without any of it touching their record. Exploring and attesting are two different acts, and the product keeps them apart until you decide to record.
The echocardiogram does not arrive as a dead PDF: LVEF, LV end-diastolic diameter, and PASP enter as trending values, ready to sit beside the next one. And the queue puts it in front of you with the days it has been waiting.
The notices come up on screen on their own, with the source and the criteria behind each number.
Rosendaal TTR reads “not yet assessable” until maintenance reaches the six months the guideline asks for. In its place you get the fraction in range — 81.8 %, 9 of 11 draws — with the explanation that the two are not the same thing. It excludes the induction period (42 days) and gaps without an INR under the Rose 2013 rule, and it says so on screen.
This patient’s 450 ms mark comes with the warning that it could not be verified in the source it was attributed to and that the societies disagree: it is advisory, not an alert criterion. The threshold it does act on, QTc ≥500 ms, travels with its full reference.
Smoking, diabetes, antihypertensive treatment, and established cardiovascular disease each have three states, not two. If one was never asked, the product tells you it is counting it as absent and that the real risk is higher than the one on screen.
Nothing to configure before you start seeing patients: your specialty’s lab orders, imaging studies, appointment types, and note sections are already in place.
All of it is editable: it is your starting point, not a straitjacket.
Patients book their visit, confirm it, and arrive with the questionnaire answered. You get minutes back on every visit, and your front desk gets calls off its plate.
Your front desk emails it or shows a QR code to scan in the waiting room. The patient answers from their phone, with autosave, and every specialty asks its own questions.
Photo, bio, price, and calendar on a page of your own, and it starts switched off: nobody sees it until you publish it. Patients see only real openings — availability minus booked visits — and pick one from their phone.
They sign in with their email and a one-time code — no password to create or remember — and see their upcoming and past visits, and request another with their details already filled in.
Dictate the note instead of typing it. And we tell you the audio may travel to your browser vendor's servers.
In your specialty, the questionnaire asks
Before the visit the patient answers from their phone whether they get chest pain or tightness, shortness of breath and at what level of exertion, palpitations, fainting, leg swelling, and smoking, and whether a parent or sibling had a heart attack or sudden death — and at what age. None of it reaches the chart until someone confirms it field by field.
Signed is signed: the original is never altered.
One clinic's data never mixes with another's.
It drafts, summarizes, and organizes. It never signs, diagnoses, or prescribes on its own.
Every action is recorded with its author and date.
A free plan that stays free, and room to grow into a multi-location clinic without switching systems. We set it up and hand it over running.
Prices, limits and terms are the same for all 11 specialties. What changes for Cardiology is its clinical tool — CV risk — included in any plan that enables the Cardiology pack.
We turn it on for you with the full Advanced plan, 14 days and no credit card. You write to us, we agree on the plan, and we hand it over running. If you don't continue, you move to the Free plan without losing your data.
A practice just getting started
USD 0
free forever
no credit card required
One professional and their front desk
USD 29
per professional / month
or USD 23 /mo billed annually
Clinics with a team, up to 2 locations
USD 59
per professional / month
or USD 47 /mo billed annually
Multi-location clinic, up to 4 locations
USD 99
per professional / month
or USD 79 /mo billed annually
All eleven specialties are available on every paid plan: the number on each card is how many you can keep active at once.
Straight answers, no hedging.
See your cardiology running: today’s ECG against May’s, risk with its provenance, and the echo that comes back without anyone having to remember to open it.